|
|
Free résumé
critiques:
The new career-industry racket
By Nick Corcodilos |
First it was online job
boards. All the jobs, all the résumés for all the people. Just go
online and your job-hunting problems are solved. Monster.com,
CareerBuilder and HotJobs became the big career-industry rackets:
They rack up huge revenues and profits, while their success rates
hover under 5%. Job hunters and employers get fleeced daily, paying lots of
cash for "platinum-level" services and "higher
rankings" for your résumés and jobs.
Then it got better.
TheLadders gave us "Only $100k+
jobs. Only $100k+ candidates." And the only problem is
that it's
a lie. It's another racket designed to fleece job hunters and
employers alike.
Now certain companies that sell résumé-writing services are
using a new ploy to sucker job hunters: Free résumé critiques that
lure you into the clutches of résumé mills. (You might find one
of these offers in the ads to the right. Sorry, but as long as I
rely on automated ads to help pay for this free advice you're
reading, I can't filter the good ads from the bad ones. I'll do my
job and write good advice. You do your job and be a smart
consumer.)
Before we get into the details, I'll repeat what I've said for
years. Write your own résumé. Yes, it can be like having a
baby -- painful but illuminating. And worth the effort.
If you're going to get
help, however, make sure you get good help. There are many
skilled, credible résumé writers who will treat you and your
career with respect and care. You'll know them because they will
spend a lot of time talking with you to assess what your talents
and abilities are so they can best present them to the companies
you want to work for.
But if a résumé writer relies only on forms that
you fill out, think again. Are you paying to fill out forms, or
for help interpreting your skills so you can be
portrayed accurately on a piece of paper? The best résumé writers
will talk with you extensively and coach you based on the
particulars of your background and needs. They're not cheap -- but
they're honest.
Cookie-cutter
résumés
When I first started headhunting I noticed a trend in the résumés
I received. There were three kinds. Some were clumsy but honest.
Some were well-written and thorough. But many were fancy and
suspiciously similar. These latter ones were often printed on the
same paper. I could pick out certain of the
"professionally-written" résumés with just a glance.
They featured the same "action verbs", the same bullet
lists, and the same layout. They were full of boilerplate text and
they went straight into the trash basket.
Cookie-cutter résumés --
those written from templates -- surface on employer's desks every
day. The pre-packaged words and phrases on such résumés are used
most often by big, national résumé-writing firms -- mills that
crank out résumés faster than you can apply for ten jobs online.
Sometimes fronted
by a "nationally-recognized résumé-writing personality," these firms use a
stable of poorly-paid writers to crank out "custom résumés" for their clients. You pay for the renowned skills
of the "personality" who leads the firm, but you get the
same snippets of cut-and-pasted verbiage that other clients get.
Out they
go with the trash
To you it's a clever, classy marketing document that makes you look
good. To the manager who receives hundreds or thousands of résumés
each month, the ones written by these résumé mills read like pulp
fiction. Beside the other résumés on the manager's desk,
it's obvious they were all written from a template by the same
firm. Your expensive "custom résumé" doesn't look so
custom to the manager who gets more of the same. Out it goes with
the trash.
Résumé
mills exposed
The arrogance and audacity of these résumé mills was bound to
expose them. A clever marketing trick now reveals just how they
operate.
Certain résumé-writing
firms promote their services with the oldest trick in the book:
"Try us for free!" But they put an added spin on this
offer. "Let us review your current résumé... it might be
costing you a great job!" They offer a free résumé critique. You send them your current
résumé, they tear it to
shreds, and they suggest you might want to have it re-written -- unless
you want to reveal to employers how unworthy you are. Some of
these reviews are downright insulting. They all play on your fears
of inadequacy and failure.
Free résumé critiques have become a marketing staple of the big
mills. It's how they snare nervous job hunters. But the question
is, how could these firms possibly provide free reviews to
everyone who sends in their résumé?
If something sounds too good to be true, it usually is. These firms
use crib sheets.
The crib
sheet
An Ask The Headhunter reader recently shared the crib sheet that one
résumé mill apparently uses
to "critique" résumés sent in by unsuspecting prospects.
Yep, it's a template: Canned statements about résumés, organized by
"problem" and chock full of comments that can be used
and re-used by... well, a roomful of monkeys that critique your résumé
by copying and pasting pre-written comments into an e-mail. These
are special monkeys that are very good at making you feel very
nervous about the quality of your résumé.
The good news is, maybe
that résumé you wrote isn't so bad after all. And, you're
probably a lot smarter than a monkey.
The crib sheet is
re-printed below. It even includes sales-pitch scripts. What résumé-writing firm is it from? That's a
good question. And that's my challenge to Ask The Headhunter
readers.
Take the
Résumé-Critique Challenge
I'm guessing that many of you have taken the "résumé critique
challenge" from some of these résumé mills. And you've
received seemingly-personal, detailed critiques. My challenge to you is this: Read
through the crib sheet below and then check the critique you were
given. Do you find the same comments and phrases? If you do,
please e-mail
me the entire critique with the common wording highlighted,
and with the full e-mail source information intact. And let me
know which résumé firm provided it.
If enough readers share their critiques with common wording identified, then we'll know
which résumé mill this crib sheet came from.
By the way, my favorite
"critique" on the crib sheet is this one:
Resume is obviously a
template…
You have chosen the Word resume template to use. This relegates your resume to looking like
about 2 million other resumes. Unfortunately, hiring managers and
recruiters can also spot a template a mile away and it reflects
badly on the candidate.
Does your résumé critique look "like about two million other ones?"
Maybe it was written by a monkey from a template...
If the firm that wrote
and uses this crib sheet would like to own up to it and prove its
copyright, I will remove it from this web site upon request. But
of course, they will be admitting they've been scamming you by using a crib
sheet to write a "custom résumé review." Shame,
shame. It was a clever marketing ploy until people figured it out.
Now, well, now these guys look like mud. And they pride
themselves on custom writing!
Caveat
emptor
I continue to advise job
hunters to do the hard work of writing their own résumés, just as
I advise them to conduct their own job search without relying on
headhunters. Nonetheless, some people will use headhunters and
they will turn to professional résumé writers. To them I say,
make sure you're using the best. You'll know them from their happy
clients.
I know some very good,
honest résumé writers. They spend considerable time to understand
their clients and to produce unique, accurate résumés. The best of
them border on being saints for the added coaching and advice they
provide. Of course, quality ranges across a spectrum. Due
diligence is important, and I suggest checking a résumé writer's
references. (Especially if you try to find a résumé writer from
an ad, like the ones Google automatically posts on these web
pages. I make no endorsements.)
What irks me is that like other legitimate businesses, résumé
writers have to compete with monkeys-on-computers that
conspire to turn the résumé business into a high-volume racket that
profits from people's fears and thrives by selling what is largely
a worthless, canned product. To those mills I have one thing to
say: The sooner you are exposed and go out of business, the better.
CRITIQUE RESPONSES
Summary / Profile Section
Resume is only one page…
You have gotten some bad
advice somewhere that a resume has to be kept to one page. That is
an old rule that went out with typewriters and paper resumes
stored in filing cabinets. A one-page resume was something that
was achievable when most people only had one or two employers in
their entire lifetimes. That's changed now. Employers want to know
more about your experience and track record so they can make an
educated decision on whether to proceed with you in the hiring
process. By being skimpy in your information, you make them guess
and they won't do that - they'll just move on to other resumes
that provide a more complete picture of the candidates. You also
reduce keyword optimization for the online databases. Computers
don't care if it's one page!
Resume developed several
years ago…
You mentioned that the resume
was originally developed several years ago. A resume isn't like a
Twinkie with an infinite shelf life. : The employment market
changes rapidly. When you originally had the resume developed, the
market was completely different than it is now. Employers and
recruiters now have different needs and technology has changed
which impacts the hiring process. While a resume may have worked
before, that does not mean it will work now in today's market.
Resume has an objective
statement…
Take out the objective.
Objectives aren't used anymore because they don't speak to the
needs of the employer but rather to your needs. That's a weak
marketing message. Start with a good summary.
Summary/Profile doesn't
stand alone or isn't strong…
The summary is pretty weak
and ineffective - it lacks impact and does not establish a strong
focus or interest. A test of a summary is to take it completely
out of the document and see if it stands by itself. If it
communicates your record of achievement, your experience level,
your value, your industry, and intimates what your immediate
career goal is, then it is a good summary. Summaries shouldn't be
wordy, overly descriptive passages but rather just what the name
implies - a summary. On the other hand, a summary shouldn't be
vague and full of soft-skills. The summary should give the reader
the main points of information - experience, job title, industry,
expertise, and (sometimes) education level. Of all the sections of
the resume, the summary is the most important because it gets read
the most and sets the tone/focus for the rest of the document.
Summary/Profile section is
too long and wordy…
The summary section is overly
wordy and bogged down in description and information that are not
needed to make an introduction to the reader and establish the
focus of the resume. It gives the impression you are trying to
cover all the possible bases but the result is something that is
difficult to read and grasp in the short time a resume is read. A
test of a summary is to take it completely out of the document and
see if it stands by itself. If it communicates your record of
achievement, your experience level, your value, your industry, and
intimates what your immediate career goal is, then it is a good
summary. There are too many vague statements that EVERY candidate
claims and that are not unique to you. Summaries shouldn't be
wordy, overly descriptive passages but rather just what the name
implies - a summary. It gives the reader the main points of
information they seek - experience, job title, industry,
expertise, and (sometimes) education level. Of all the sections of
the resume, the summary is the most important because it gets read
the most and sets the tone/focus for the rest of the document.
Resume doesn't have a
summary/intro section at all…
The most valuable real estate
in the resume - the first half of the first page - is wasted on
this resume by not having a great, hard-hitting summary that
establishes the focus of the resume and gives a quick overview of
what you have to offer. This section is the most-read section of
the resume by hiring managers (it's the "hook") and the
opportunity is wasted by not having a summary. A test of a summary
is to take it completely out of the document and see if it stands
by itself. If it communicates your record of achievement, your
value, your industry, and intimates what your immediate career
goal is, then it is a good summary.
Resume has a highlights
section at the top or in the top section…
You have pulled your career
highlights out into a separate section at the top. Instead of
highlighting them, this actually weakens them because it takes
them out of a frame of reference for the reader. The reader
doesn't know where, when, or under what market conditions you
achieved these things. Are they ten years old? Are they recent?
Are they all from one position? Move them back into the experience
chronology where they can appear with the jobs with which they are
associated. Employers will probably skip them if you leave them
where they are and go straight to the experience anyway so put the
important facts in the experience section. Think of it like a
newspaper - if you pull the first sentence out of each news
article and detach them from the headline and supporting
information, it is confusing.
You can't tell what the
person is targeting from the summary…
The summary does not
adequately narrow the focus of your job search, something a resume
needs to do from the very beginning at the top of the first page.
Your opening profile or summary should immediately set in the mind
of the reader the following: immediate target, level of
experience, industry expertise, and value of your experience.
Instead, your summary seems more like a shotgun blast - you are
trying to cover everything but as a result you don't come across
as a valuable contributor toward anything.
The cover letter is in the
same file as the resume…
First, take the cover letter
out of the file and put it in a separate file. Most employers read
the cover letter AFTER the resume anyway so it's best to either
copy/paste it in the body of the email to which you attach the
resume or make it a separate file altogether.
Content
Resume is a functional
format resume…
The format you are using
(called a functional or skills resume), is one that is LOATHED by
executive recruiters and line management, for several reasons: (1)
they have to read the entire thing before they can get a feel for
you and I can guarantee they will not do this, (2) the reader is
left to try and figure out when/where/how you did the things you
have listed in the top section of your resume. Trust me, the
reader will not do ANY work on your behalf, so it is not wise to
leave it to them to try and 'figure it out'. More than likely,
they will simply move to the next resume, and (3) when people use
this format, it is a red flag to the reader that they usually are
trying to hide something. We work with hundreds of hiring managers
from all sorts of industries and almost to a person they report
they detest the functional format. Change the organization to a
reverse chronological so it won't appear that you are trying to
hide something (like a prison term).
Education details come
before the experience section…
Don't lead the resume with
your education. You are not a new graduate and your education is
not going to be your best selling point. For someone at your level
of career, employers will be more interested in your experience.
Only someone who is newly graduated and only has education to
offer should start the resume with the education section. Move the
education and training to the end of the resume.
Resume puts all job titles
with each employer in a list at the beginning…
You've lumped all your
positions with each company into a listing at the beginning of
each job section. This effectively negates the benefit you would
gain from showing career progression and increase in level if you
treated each position separately. I realize that many of the
positions had similar job descriptions but the accomplishments of
each should be different. Break the jobs out separately and handle
them in reverse chronological order, making sure to highlight what
you accomplished in each position.
Job descriptions are too
thin or poorly written…
The job descriptions are too
weak, bland, and unexciting. They don't give a clear, dynamic
picture of the scope of your positions or career. The ideal job
description briefly summarizes your duties in paragraph format and
then uses bullets for your accomplishments and results achieved to
maximize their impact. Poor job descriptions don't paint a picture
of the scope of your job and fail to create a good frame of
reference for your achievements. A powerful resume has job
descriptions that start out strong and sustain interest by
emphasizing key skills and doing so in a brief, powerful way.
Leave out low-level information and concentrate on the important,
complex activities that provide broad scope to your experience and
support your target. Don't be vague but rather try to get a lot of
impact in a short amount of space. You want to communicate strong
abilities, depth, and unique qualities - not sound like a job
advertisement or something out of the HR manual.
Job descriptions are much
too long and wordy…
The job descriptions are too
protracted and wordy for the most important information to stand
out. It is not necessary to list everything you did in a position.
You've used long, flowing sentences rather than tight,
hard-hitting phrases. Concentrate on the important information and
leave out low-level tasks and duties. Don't be vague but rather
try to get a lot of impact in a short amount of space. You want to
communicate strong abilities, depth, and unique qualities - not
sound like a job advertisement. The ideal job description BRIEFLY
summarizes your most important duties in paragraph format and then
uses bullets to draw attention to the accomplishments (or results
statements) to maximize their impact.
No achievements stand out
or bulleted items are not achievements but just more job
description…
Almost the entire content is
written as task-based information. Task-based means it tells
"what you did". To be effective and create excitement,
it needs to be results-based - "what was achieved as a RESULT
of what you did?" Employers are looking for results. They
want to know you have solved problems similar to theirs and that
you achieved the results for which they are looking. What you have
is just job description and it is going to be very similar to all
the other qualified candidates. The ones who get the interviews
will be those who show the results of their work. Show the reader
what you have achieved!
Resume is a sales person's
or some other job where performance is judged on quantitative data
but they don't have enough or any of it in the content…
I'm sure you know what a
numbers-oriented field you are in and the accomplishments need to
put more emphasis on specific, measurable highlights that reflect
your ability to produce those numbers for your employer. Employers
look for potential in the quantitative evidence you show of your
success so make sure you get that type of information in the
resume in a highlighted way.
Resume goes back further
than ten years in detail…
There is too much work
history detailed. Employers are generally interested only in the
past 10-15 years experience because it is what is most relevant to
the challenges they face today. Cut off or simply list
employers/job titles/dates that are far back in time. If you are
concerned about showing depth, there are ways to truncate your
older experience while still showing you have good background from
which to draw upon.
Overall content is thin,
short, or bland…
The content of the resume is
too thin and weak. It does not generate interest or show how you
are any different than the other candidates against whom you are
competing. You have not provided good description of your roles
and responsibilities and your accomplishments are scanty and
vague. Employers need to have a good idea of where you have been
in your career, what roles you have held, what levels of
responsibilities, and some of the key challenges you have faced.
If they have to guess or assume something, they won't do it - they
will just go to the next resume that has more detail. They don't
have time to chase after "maybe" candidates. They will
only call the candidates who have the best qualifications on
paper.
Overall content is too
long, wordy, or unfocused…
The entire resume is overly
descriptive and wordy. You have too much "stuff" or
irrelevant information in it. It's a "data dump" - you
weren't sure what to include and what to delete so you just
included everything. It appears that you are confused about your
strategy and don't want to miss a job because you left out one
little detail. Including all this irrelevant/redundant information
actually weakens the resume. Find your focus and cut out what
doesn't directly support that focus. Cut out wordiness and
over-description. Cut out redundancies. Put everything into tight
writing instead of narrative. It's a novel instead of a resume.
Employers won't read it because it takes too much time. They can't
get a clear picture of your background without spending fifteen
minutes reading it word-for-word.
Resume content reads like
a job advertisement or has no impact…
The language of the resume
has poor impact, does not generate excitement, and does not
position you as a leader in your area of expertise. It's
"average" - not what you want when you are trying to
sell your abilities and position yourself above the competition.
It reads like every other resume and will not inspire most readers
to make contact with you.
Content is written in full
sentences with lots of description…
Resumes are written in a
technique called "tight writing" or essentially, verb
phrases, where the subject is generally understood rather than
voiced. Articles (the, a, an) are minimally used in tight writing
and only the core message is voiced. You have long, flowing
sentences that describe every action and motivation - information
the employer simply is not interested in at this point in the
process. Some information is irrelevant and some is redundant. You
are trying to accomplish the interview with the resume and it just
won't work. Employers don't have time to read all this.
Resume includes
information protected under fair hiring laws (DOB, marital status,
race, etc.)…
Employers are very wary of
anything on a resume that might later result in a lawsuit for
hiring discrimination. It's safer for them to just reject the
resume at the start if it intimates anything that reveals
religions, gender, date of birth, marital status, children, etc.
The benefit to your candidacy from this information is minimal,
too, so it's better to play it safe and take this out of the
resume.
Resume talks about hobbies
or other irrelevant info…
Keep personal interests,
hobbies, etc. off your resume. This information adds nothing to
your value as the best candidate to do the job. Employers aren't
interested in your hobbies - they just want to know if you can
bring value to their organization.
Resume lists previous
salaries…
Never, ever list your salary
on your resume. You limit yourself by either underpricing or
overpricing. You don't want the employer to make a judgment on
your abilities based on your past "price". Sometimes,
people are underpaid and sometimes overpaid. Salary doesn't
correlate to value.
Resume is from a foreign
national applying to US companies within the US and it is in CV
form rather than resume form…
We don't use CVs in the US
but rather resumes. Resumes are very different than CVs and
provide different information, different format, and use
different, more aggressive language than a CV. The simple fact
that you are using a CV to apply for US jobs shows you don't
understand the US job market and that is a message you don't want
to communicate to potential employers. You want to come across in
your presentation as being as informed as any US citizen would be
about the market, especially if the position you are targeting
might involve hiring of other employees.
Resume contains reference
names and contact information…
Never put references on a
resume. Employers don't need this information at this stage of the
game and you are putting private contact information into
circulation that should not be in the public realm without caution
due to increased risk of identity theft.
Resume could benefit from
having company descriptions included…
A brief description of each
company where you have worked would help give the reader a better
idea of your background. Company descriptions that include main
product/service delivered, annual revenues, size, number of
employees, markets, etc. help the reader get a clearer picture of
the environments in which you have worked. The description doesn't
have to be long. Something along the lines of "Fortune 1000
company producing manufactured, durable goods for the North
American market. Annual revenues in excess of $500 million and
1400 employees."
Resume includes
"reason for leaving" for prior positions…
There is absolutely no
justification to include your reasons for leaving a position on a
resume or in a cover letter. The reason is irrelevant. Instead of
concentrating on the past, you should be showing the reader your
potential.
Design/Format
Resume contains mechanical
errors…
There are NUMEROUS mechanical
errors in the resume ranging from misspellings to capitalization
problems to syntax issues. This gives a very bad impression,
especially of someone at your level. Employers expect more
attention to detail from higher salary, higher skilled candidates
such as you. Hourly wage earners can get by with errors but you
can't.
Resume is ugly or has an
outdated appearance…
I would recommend a more
professional design or look-and-feel to the document to provide a
more executive impression. A lot can be done with the formatting
and design to improve first visual impressions while still
maintaining a conservative appearance. You wouldn't go to an
interview in a cheap suit so don't make your resume appear in one
either. This is especially important for candidates targeting
higher salaries (such as you are) because employers expect you to
have a more pulled-together, slick presentation of yourself
because they expect you to give a professional presentation to
customers, vendors, and others with whom you would be dealing at
your target level. Visual impression is the first impression so
make it good.
Resume has no email
address on it…
You have forgotten to include
your email address on your resume. Don't ever make an employer
hunt down your email or phone number. Employers just don't have
time. They'll just go on to the next resume instead. If you are
going to leave off something, leave off the street address.
Employers don't need it to contact you and you preserve a little
privacy on the Internet by eliminating it.
Job seeker uses his work
email on the resume…
Don't use your work email on
the resume. That's bad form. It gives prospective employers the
impression that you use company time and resources for personal
things (and worst of all, your job search!)
Resume is obviously a
template…
You have chosen the Word
resume template to use. This relegates your resume to looking like
about 2 million other resumes. Unfortunately, hiring managers and
recruiters can also spot a template a mile away and it reflects
badly on the candidate. It's very important to make your resume
memorable and even formatting can help. Another negative about
using a template is that rather than fitting the format to your
experience and content, you have to fit your content to the
format. The result of that is like trying to fit a size 10 foot
into a size 7 shoe. It can be done but the result isn't pretty and
it doesn't work very well.
Resume is written in
paragraph form or has big paragraph-like sections of more than 5-7
lines…
The huge chunks of text
almost assure the reader won't read it. A resume is read
differently - the summary is read and then the rest of the
document is scanned quickly with job titles, bullet statements,
and other highlighted material being read first. Total reading
time is about 45 seconds. If a resume can't be read that quickly,
it won't be read.
Resume has long lists of
bullets…
Long lists of bulleted items
become moot. The purpose of bullets is to draw attention and they
are usually best reserved for results and accomplishments. By
using too many, using them to begin every line, or using them to
indicate beginnings of paragraphs you lose the initial intent of
pulling the reader's eye to the content. Shorten bulleted lists to
no more than five and use them only for results or
accomplishments. Don't use bullets to simply mark beginnings of
paragraphs or in long lists.
Resume is choppy or
disorganized…
The resume isn't formatted
and organized to give the reader what he/she seeks quickly. Your
organization of the resume shows you don't understand how a resume
is read. Resumes aren't read start to finish like a book. Instead,
the summary is read and then the rest of the document is scanned
quickly with job titles, bullet statements, and other highlighted
material being read first. The primary interests of hiring
managers come in the following order: summary, job titles,
experience, bullets, education.
Mechanics
Resume is written in
passive voice or mixed between…
You vacillate between active
voice and passive voice throughout the document. To be effective,
a resume should be written in active voice. Harbingers of the
passive voice are "responsibilities included",
"responsible for", "duties included" or noun
phrases tied with prepositions such as "Quality member
of" or "Representative of". In the active voice,
the subject acts. In the passive voice, the subject is acted upon.
The active voice is more natural, direct, vigorous and emphatic -
traits you want your resume to have in tone.
Resume is in first
person…
You have written the document
in narrative language as if it were an autobiography or a letter.
You use personal pronouns throughout ("I",
"me", "my", etc.) which is awkward and
incorrect syntax. A resume must be written in a language that can
be scanned quickly for meaning rather than as a book is written
where the reader reads it from beginning to end. A resume isn't
read from beginning to end; most readers read the summary and then
scan the rest quickly paying attention to information that is
brought to the fore through formatting, arrangement and order. In
the narrative format, the reader can't do that so you kill the
effectiveness of the content you have labored to detail. Take out
all those personal pronouns - there shouldn't be a single one in
the resume.
Resume uses the same initial
word too much… You have initial word redundancies throughout.
That means you have consecutive sentences or bullets starting with
the same verb or word and/or you overuse some of the same verbs or
beginning words of sentences. Change up your wording. Redundant
wording will put your reader to sleep through sheer monotony.
Strategy
Considering your career
situation and the types of jobs you are pursuing, your resume is
definitely not marketing you in your best light. It doesn't pull
its weight by convincing the reader of your qualifications,
instead merely assuming the reader will work to find what is best
about you - definitely NOT what you want. Right now you are not
giving the reader the right information to make an educated
decision about your abilities.
The resume does little to
convince the reader of your value or that you can make a
difference. It primarily describes actions not results. You must
generate excitement and interest in a resume but this document is
not accomplishing that. The resume positions you for a lower level
job and lower salary than you desire.
You are in a
business/position where the numbers tell the tale. Unfortunately,
the resume does a poor job of getting your performance data across
in a powerful way, concentrating instead on aspects of the job
that are common to all candidates. Because of this, your resume
does not stand out in the crowd nor does it position you
powerfully against your competition in the market.
Sales Responses
Client wants a menu of
services…
We really don't have a menu
of services because our job search tools are subjective for each
client. They are customized and tailored, so each client can
utilize what he/she needs. Some clients need interview coaching,
for example, while others do not. Typically, if a client needs
assistance with job search, we will confer with him/her and
outline some ideas. Again -- specific to the client's goals and
criteria (some want a nationwide search, some want to only search
in their "backyard"). What you should know, however, is
that the services are priced at between $99 and $200. None are
more than $200.
Client needs convincing of
our qualifications…
Oh... you are asking me now
to convince you to use our firm and not another resume service. I
am a TERRIBLE sales person!! I'm a writer and analyst. My strength
comes from knowing what you are up against and pointing it out to
you, and of course, then seeing the success of our clients after
they have their resume redone.
The fact that about 50
organizations and associations retain us as their Resume Expert
for their members also is an excellent indicator as to our quality
and expertise.
I realize you are being
diligent in researching firms before making a selection - and
that's a good thing. However, I would find it hard to believe that
other firms (and I know nearly everyone in this industry) have
credentials that match ours. We serve as the resume expert for
about 50 different associations/organizations, including as you
know, theladders.com, which only accepts a handful of firms to
work with their members. Also, we have our guarantee which many
other firms do not, as they are not as confident in their product.
If these items do not make
you feel that we are the right firm for you, then perhaps we're
not, as we like to team up with clients who feel comfortable
working with us. Resume writing is a partnership, and if you are
not confident in the person's ability, it only makes the process
of job search more stressful.
Responses to price
objections…
Clients who retain our firm
see this as an investment in their career. Competition is so tough
these days that people are savvy to the fact that they are first
being judged on their paperwork (resume and cover letter).
We're not for everyone, and
if you feel all right in risking a potential dream job, then yes,
I guess you should make your decision based on price.
Unfortunately, we can't offer
a discount. Our quotes are based on the complexity of the
individual project. To discount, we'd have to cut corners
somewhere in the process and we just don't cut corners. Our
quality of work is our hallmark and we won't sacrifice quality
just to make a sale.
General process
responses…
We send you the confirmation
and the questionnaire together. Once you get that back to us, it's
generally 3-5 business days for completion of the whole thing.
We're pretty fast because we know you are waiting on us so you can
get started on your job search.
The samples on the website
are just a general method of giving clients an opportunity to see
our style and formatting, and that each clients' resume is
different. Since we're published in about 30 career books, each
sample would look different to show a variety of formats.
I'm sorry. We can only
provide one critique per client. Beyond that, and it gets into
consulting and editing - services for which we charge. I'm sure
you understand.
Have you been scammed with a "free resume critique?"
Does the critique you were given include verbatim phrases from the
crib sheet above? Then please e-mail
me the entire critique with the common wording highlighted,
and with the full e-mail source information intact. And let me
know which resume firm provided it.
Come join the discussion
on this topic on the Ask The Headhunter Blog.
Please tell us what you
think of this article.
More Headhunter
Articles
The contents of this site are Copyright (c)
1995-2015 North Bridge Group LLC.
All rights reserved.
This material is for personal use only. Republication and redissemination,
including posting to news groups, is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.
Ask The Headhunter, Fearless Job Hunting, the ATH logo and other ATH titles are trademarks or registered trademarks of North Bridge
Group LLC and
Nick A. Corcodilos. |
User
agreement, legal information and disclaimer. |
|